Priority boost details – and why it’s not recommended

Some times, we see customer has (accidentally or otherwise) enabled the option ‘boost priority’ for SQL Server worker threads. In general Microsoft does not recommend that you set this option. Why?

First a bit of background. When we set the ‘priority boost’ option using sp_configure what is happening is that after restart the SQL engine will call Win32 API SetPriorityClass() and passes in HIGH_PRIORITY_CLASS (if you are debugger savvy, you can set breakpoints on these APIs and check what is happening – that’s what I did, no source code is required to verify this). From MSDN:



Process that performs time-critical tasks that must be executed immediately. The threads of the process preempt the threads of normal or idle priority class processes. An example is the Task List, which must respond quickly when called by the user, regardless of the load on the operating system. Use extreme care when using the high-priority class, because a high-priority class application can use nearly all available CPU time.

It then proceeds to call SetThreadPriority() with priority as THREAD_PRIORITY_HIGHEST. For this combination of Process Priority Class and Thread Priority Level, the base priority level of these worker threads is 15. The only ones higher than this in the hierarchy of the OS are any threads which have process priority class set to REALTIME_PRIORITY_CLASS (which should be a very rare case for any application.) this means that many SQL worker threads are running at a priority level which is close to the highest on the system. Hence, they will tend to be selected frequently by kernel dispatcher to execute on the CPU.

So what is the effect?

There is clear precedent in the support teams of priority boost causing unresponsive servers. Sluggish UI / mouse / keyboard movements are other common symptoms if this setting is interfering with the capability of the OS to give (non-SQL) threads their desired quantum on the CPU. On a cluster, having priority boosted SQL threads can cause other critical threads such as the resource monitor’s IsAlive poll thread to timeout, thereby causing unwanted failover. Therefore we do not recommend to set priority boost to 1, especially in clustered instances.

Reference links:



Effective Base Priority:

Windows Priority levels: and


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.